Data Independence
Understanding Data Independence:
In the constantly changing world of data processing, the notion of data independence is crucial for the construction of highly extensible, tolerant, and efficient databases. Consequently, the complexity of dynamic databases makes it very important to manipulate and transform data structures without much interference with other applications. This data independence makes it possible for organizations to assimilate new requirements, maintain data integrity, and shield business logic from variation of the underpinning data organization. But what is data independence and why is it considered crucial?
What is Data Independence?
When data is described at one tier, this property allows manipulations to be made to the schema of the database in that tier without affecting the schema at other tiers. In other words, it somehow separates the architecture of how data information is stored from the architecture that is used in presenting it. This gives a mechanism of getting around the change in the storage structure of the database without having to change any of the interfaces, applications, or queries that makes use of the data.
There are two primary types of data independence:
1. Logical Data Independence
2. Physical Data Independence
1. Logical Data Independence
Local logical data independence is the freedom to modify the logical (conceptual) schema, of the database without changing the External. Schema or application programs. Metric schema on the other hand defines the content of the database, the layout and how the different pieces of data are related. For instance: Suppose, a decision has been made to add a new attribute to a table, or change relationships between table and/or fields, LDI guarantees that such changes do not impact the end-users and applications.
This level of data independence is assumed to be the more difficult of the two to implement since modifications to the internal schema may impact the methods by which data is retrieved. For example, an added new table or modification of the linking paradigm needed significant alteration of specific queries or the application logic.
2. Physical Data Independence
Physical data independence is the freedom to alter the method of storing the physical data (like altering the form in which the data is stored on disk etc.) without affecting the physical schematic or external view. The physical schema focuses on the way that the data is kept, and the techniques utilized in indexing, file organization and the way the data is optimized in order to enable extra fast access. For instance, if an organization is planning to change from one class of the database storage system like changing from a flat file storage system to distributed storage system or change the method of indexing, such changes should NOT affect the structure of the data as perceived by users.
Most approaches to physical data independence are easier to achieve than the logical data independence and most DBMSs are primarily concerned with the achievement of physical data independence. Commonly it is the task of a DBMS to handle the mapping between the logical and the physical view of data, so that lower-level details are invisible for the application developers or system administrators.
Data Independence
Data independence is now an important aspect that needs to be considered when designing a system.
1. Improving organization flexibility and adaptableness
Data independence is very important as it warrants that a database system will grow in the future without major changes. In most instances, the business requirements change, the need to integrate with new sources or carry out improvements through enhanced performances. With data independence, these changes can be made without effecting the current applications running on it or necessitating the rewriting of the user queries and business logics.
2. Sustaining application development
With data independence, the user-interface and application programs are made free from changes in the database structure, thus encouraging faster development of cycles and maintenance. Following this, the internal structure of the used database can be enhanced or redesigned to better address specific needs of the business organization without having to redesign the applications that rely on the database.
3. Data security and its alive integrity:
Data independence enables more secure, and more consistent data to be managed. Since users work with data by using views or external schemas, additions of the physical schema alterations or of the complicated indexing strategies do not need to be announced and are unlikely to confuse users or result in exposure of data.
4. Tuning of the Database
Physical data independence gives the database administrators the leeway to rearrange the data storage and recovery function without changing the logical structure of the database. This has implications that indicate that while optimizing physical structures like indexing strategies or storage layout physical, structural improvements can be made without any communication changes to the users or applications approaching the data.
5. Improved Scalability
As the size of databases increases, replication and increasing of storage and indexing becomes a major necessity. When physical data independence is achieved, scaling can and will happen without many changes to the database design, and the applications that call on it, thus allowing the business to manage higher volumes of data and users.
Data independence is always desirable, but not always achievable, and most especially if it seeks to be acknowledged at the logical level. Some challenges include:
. Complexity in Schema Evolution: The manipulation of the logical schema of a database can be challenging, particularly when the schema is embedded in the application program. For example, to rescale a field in the database, one may need relieving it and reproving it, which implies that true logical independence is difficult to achieve.
. Performance Considerations: Minor alterations to the physical schema or data storage methods may be required but these may have adverse effect on the performance of the system. Physical data independence typically implies having complex systems for translating between the logical and the physical well.
. Database-Specific Constraints: But there are limitations found in some existing DBMS restrictive external data independence, especially the logical level one. Certain systems may need a user’s interference or heavy rewriting of the application software when the data model changes.
Conclusion
The concept of data independence is one of the key ideas in modern database management and reflects the possibility of ongoing change to the data model without affecting other software and users. This both technical and physical data independence let organizations adapt to the evolving business requirements and technology advancement. Although attaining physical data independence is to some extent easier, attaining the LDI is a bit more difficult but provides flexibility with the longer-term strategy.
For businesses, data independence is the first step in the development of affordable, scalable, and maintainable database systems adaptable to evolving needs at a fair amount of cost and organizational interruptive Ness.
Comments
Post a Comment